I noticed that the Copernicus DEM (Digital Elevation Model) for both GLO-30 and GLO-90 is available to download freely at opentopography.org. This peaked my interest to see how TimiČoara (altough, having a flat terrain) looks like, and to see if it would be possible to do 3D print of it’s Digital Elevation Model.
Not only Copernicus DEM is covered on opentopography.org for our AOI:
I chose to use the GLO-30 DEM for it’s 30 meter resolution. Unfortunately, I did not see the EEA 10m DEM. The GeoTIFF export for our AOI is only 1.8MB once decompressed.
This is the file we end up with, as gdalinfo
tells us:
Driver: GTiff/GeoTIFF
Files: output_COP30.tif
output_COP30.tif.aux.xml
Size is 834, 582
Coordinate System is:
GEOGCRS["WGS 84",
ENSEMBLE["World Geodetic System 1984 ensemble",
MEMBER["World Geodetic System 1984 (Transit)"],
MEMBER["World Geodetic System 1984 (G730)"],
MEMBER["World Geodetic System 1984 (G873)"],
MEMBER["World Geodetic System 1984 (G1150)"],
MEMBER["World Geodetic System 1984 (G1674)"],
MEMBER["World Geodetic System 1984 (G1762)"],
MEMBER["World Geodetic System 1984 (G2139)"],
ELLIPSOID["WGS 84",6378137,298.257223563,
LENGTHUNIT["metre",1]],
ENSEMBLEACCURACY[2.0]],
PRIMEM["Greenwich",0,
ANGLEUNIT["degree",0.0174532925199433]],
CS[ellipsoidal,2],
AXIS["geodetic latitude (Lat)",north,
ORDER[1],
ANGLEUNIT["degree",0.0174532925199433]],
AXIS["geodetic longitude (Lon)",east,
ORDER[2],
ANGLEUNIT["degree",0.0174532925199433]],
USAGE[
SCOPE["Horizontal component of 3D system."],
AREA["World."],
BBOX[-90,-180,90,180]],
ID["EPSG",4326]]
Data axis to CRS axis mapping: 2,1
Origin = (21.127222222222201,45.830138888888882)
Pixel Size = (0.000277777777778,-0.000277777777778)
Metadata:
AREA_OR_POINT=Area
Image Structure Metadata:
COMPRESSION=LZW
INTERLEAVE=BAND
LAYOUT=COG
Corner Coordinates:
Upper Left ( 21.1272222, 45.8301389) ( 21d 7'38.00"E, 45d49'48.50"N)
Lower Left ( 21.1272222, 45.6684722) ( 21d 7'38.00"E, 45d40' 6.50"N)
Upper Right ( 21.3588889, 45.8301389) ( 21d21'32.00"E, 45d49'48.50"N)
Lower Right ( 21.3588889, 45.6684722) ( 21d21'32.00"E, 45d40' 6.50"N)
Center ( 21.2430556, 45.7493056) ( 21d14'35.00"E, 45d44'57.50"N)
Band 1 Block=256x256 Type=Float32, ColorInterp=Gray
Min=78.133 Max=124.985
Minimum=78.133, Maximum=124.985, Mean=91.673, StdDev=5.887
Metadata:
STATISTICS_MAXIMUM=124.98538970947
STATISTICS_MEAN=91.672999431603
STATISTICS_MINIMUM=78.132995605469
STATISTICS_STDDEV=5.8870346058939
STATISTICS_VALID_PERCENT=100
Importing into QGIS, and changing the symbology render type to hillshade:
Using the r.report module from GRASS to interrogate the raster:
r.report map=output_COP30 units=k
The output indicates us that the raster covers $510km^2$
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| RASTER MAP CATEGORY REPORT |
|LOCATION: world_latlong_wgs84 Thu Sep 29 18:41:59 2022|
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| north: 90N east: 180E |
|REGION south: 90S west: 180W |
| res: 1 res: 1 |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|MASK: none |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|MAP: (untitled) (output_COP30 in timisoaradem) |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Category Information | square |
|#|description | kilometers|
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|*|no data. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |510,065,622|
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|TOTAL |510,065,622|
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
In order to produce an 3D STL file, I have used a plugin for QGIS called DEMto3D.
After using a Prusa i3 MK3 3D printer and some 10 hours of patience, the final result is:
It is something I would consider a failure. Even with settings as 5x vertical exaggeration, and detail print for PrusaSlicer, the details in the print are pretty much indistinguishable. It would probably be better to span this over multiple physical prints so that details would be more evident. One other interesting thing in the future would be to see if we can print 3D OpenStreetMap features.